Issue 2024 - Vol. 1
Dossier

Between passives and impersonals: clauses involving -wa in Yaqui

Lilián Guerrero
Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas / UNAM
Valeria Belloro
Facultad de Lenguas y Letras / UAQ

Published 2024-03-18

Keywords

  • voice alternation,
  • passive,
  • impersonal,
  • Yaqui,
  • Uto-Aztecan

How to Cite

Guerrero, L., & Belloro, V. (2024). Between passives and impersonals: clauses involving -wa in Yaqui. RASAL Lingüística, (1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.56683/rs241024

Abstract

Yaqui (Uto-Aztecan; Mexico) has several morphological mechanisms to encode voice changes, including the suffix -wa, a morpheme that has not been fully analyzed. This study examines the basic properties of clauses involving -wa in Yaqui based on oral texts and discusses some aspects of their structure and interpretation. The data show that clauses involving -wa function as promotional as well as non-promotional passive constructions depending on the status of the P argument, nominative in promotional passives, accusative in non-promotional ones. Plural patients neutralize case distinctions, and the function of P cannot be determined. Clauses involving -wa are also possible with intransitive verbs and dicendi verbs, forming non-promotional passives. In all cases, the omission of the A argument is obligatory. These clauses are more frequent in life stories than in other discourse genres, and are typically associated with a P argument serving as a continuous topic affected by the actions of the omitted A, whose identity can nevertheless be inferred and correlates with authority figures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Álvarez, A. (2007). Eventos no-agentivos, alternancia causativo/incoativo y gramaticalización en lengua yaqui. Lingüística Mexicana, IV(1), 5-29.
  2. Belloro, V. (2020). Poniendo el ‘foco’ en la pasiva perifrástica. Estructura informativa en las oraciones pasivas del español. Onomázein, 48 (junio), 107-127.
  3. Belloro, V. y Guerrero, L. (2010). La función discursiva de los argumentos postpuestos en yaqui. En R. M. Ortiz Ciscomani (Coord.), Estudios Lingüísticos, vol. 2 (pp. 71-95). Universidad de Sonora.
  4. Comrie, B. (1985). Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology. En T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description 3 (pp. 309-348). Cambridge University Press.
  5. Comrie, B. (1988). Passive and voice. En M. Shibatani (Ed.), Passive and voice (pp. 9-23). John Benjamins.
  6. Comrie, B. y Polinsky, M. (1993). Causatives and Transitivity. John Benjamins.
  7. Dedrick, J. y Casad, E. (1999). Sonora Yaqui Language Structures. University of Arizona Press.
  8. Dixon, R. M. W. y Aikhenvald, A. (2000). Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Escalante, F. (1990). Voice and Argument Structure in Yaqui [Tesis doctoral, University of Arizona].
  10. Estrada, Z., Tubino Blanco, M. y Villalpando, J. (2015). Valency classes in Yaqui. En A. Malchukov y B. Comrie (Eds.), Valency Classes in the World’s Languages (pp. 1359-1390). Mouton de Gruyter.
  11. Félix, R. (2005). La exclusión del agente en las construcciones pasivas en yaqui. Lingüística Mexicana, 11(1), 81-90.
  12. Fox, B. y Hopper, P. (1994). Voice: Form and Function. John Benjamins.
  13. Givón, T. (1994). Voice and Inversion. John Benjamins.
  14. Guerrero, L. (2004). ¿Intransitividad dividida en Yaqui? En I. Barreras y M. Castro (Eds.), Memorias del VII Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste, tomo 1 (pp. 335-367). Universidad de Sonora.
  15. Guerrero, L. (2006). The Structure and Function of Yaqui Complementation. Lincom.
  16. Guerrero, L. (2007). Estructuras argumentales alternativas: las cláusulas aplicativas en yaqui. En Z. Estrada, A. Álvarez, L. Guerrero y M. B. Carpio (Eds.), Mecanismos de voz y formación de palabra (pp. 177–204). Plaza y Valdez/Universidad de Sonora.
  17. Guerrero, L. (2008). Yaqui causation, its form-function interface. En Z. Estrada, S. Wichmann, C. Chamoreau y A. Álvarez (Eds.), Studies in Voice and Transitivity (pp. 201-221). Lincom.
  18. Guerrero, L. (2019). Grammatical relations in Yaqui. En A. Witzlack-Makarevich y B. Bickel (Eds.), Argument Selectors: A New Perspective on Grammatical Relations (pp. 433-467). John Benjamins.
  19. Guerrero, L. (2022a). Transitivity and split argument coding in Yaqui. International Journal of American Linguistics, 88(4), 535-571.
  20. Guerrero, L. (2022b). Typical and atypical applicative constructions in Yaqui. En S. Pacchiarotti y F. Zúñiga (Eds.), Applicative Morphology: Neglected Syntactic and Non-Syntactic Functions (pp. 21-50). Mouton de Gruyter.
  21. Guerrero, L. (2023). Reflexive constructions in Yaqui. En K. Janic, N. Puddu y M. Haspelmath (Eds.), Reflexive Constructions in the World’s Languages (pp. 701-730). Language Science Press.
  22. Guerrero, L. y Belloro, V. (2010). On word order and information structure in Yaqui. En J. Camacho, R. Gutiérrez Bravo y L. Sánchez (Eds.), Information Structure in Indigenous Languages of the Americas (pp.115-137). Mouton de Gruyter.
  23. Guerrero, L., Ibáñez, S. y Mejía, Y. (2022). Transitividad (no) canónica. Reflexiones a partir de lenguas habladas en México. Breviarios de Lingüística 1. UNAM.
  24. Guerrero, L. y Van Valin, R. (2004). Yaqui and the analysis of primary object languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(3), 290-319.
  25. Harley, H., Haugen, J. y Tubino Blanco, M. (2008). El sufijo -ri en Yaqui: ¿es en realidad un sustantivante pasivo? En R. M. Ortiz Ciscomani (Ed.), Memorias del IX Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste (pp. 193–212). Universidad de Sonora.
  26. Haspelmath, M. (1993). More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. En B. Comrie y M. Polinsky (Eds), Causatives and Ttransitivity (pp. 87-120). John Benjamins.
  27. Jelinek, E. y F. Escalante (1987). Passive/impersonal in Yaqui. Ponencia presentada en CAIL, Chicago.
  28. Jelinek, E. y F. Escalante (2000). Unaccusative and unergative verbs in Yaqui. En E. Casad y T. Willet (Eds) Uto-Aztecan: Structural, Temporal and Geographic Perspectives (pp. 171-182). Universidad de Sonora.
  29. Keenan, E. (1985). Passive in the world’s languages. En T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description 1 (pp. 243-282). Cambridge University Press.
  30. Keenan, E. y Dryer, M. (2007). Passive in the world’s languages. En T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description 1 (pp. 325-361). Cambridge University Press.
  31. Kemmer, S. (1993). The Middle Voice. John Benjamins.
  32. Kittilä, S. (2002). Towards a Comprehensive Typology [General Linguistics 5]. Åbo Akademis Tryckeri.
  33. König, E. y Gast, V. (2008). Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Explorations. Mouton de Gruyter.
  34. Kulikov, L. (2011). Voice Typology. Oxford University Press.
  35. Langacker, R. (1977). Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar. Volumen 1. An Overview of Uto-Aztecan Grammar. Summer Institute of Linguistics/University of Texas at Arlington.
  36. Lindenfeld, J. (1973). Yaqui Syntax. University of California.
  37. Malchukov, A. (2005). Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction competition. En M. Amberber y H. de Hoop (Eds.), Competition and Variation in Natural Languages (pp. 73-117). Elsevier.
  38. Malchukov, A. y Comrie, B. (2015). Valency Classes in the World’s Languages (Vol 1-2). Mouton de Gruyter.
  39. Malchukov, A. y de Swart, P. (2009). Differential case marking and actancy variations. En A. Malchukov y A. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Case (pp. 339-355). Oxford University Press.
  40. Malchukov, A. y Siewierska, A. (2011). Impersonal Constructions. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. John Benjamins.
  41. Næss, Å. (2007). Prototypical Transitivity. John Benjamins.
  42. Nedjalkov, B. (1988). The Typology of Resultative Constructions. John Benjamins.
  43. Peterson, D. (2007). Applicative Constructions. Oxford University Press.
  44. Schäfer, F. (2008). The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. External Arguments in Change-of-State Contexts. John Benjamins.
  45. Shibatani, M. (1985). Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language, 61(4), 821-848.
  46. Shibatani, M. (1988). Passive and Voice. John Benjamins.
  47. Shibatani, M. (1996). Applicatives and benefactives: a cognitive account. En M. Shibatani y S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Their Form and Meaning (pp. 157-194). Oxford University Press.
  48. Shibatani, M. (2002). The causative continuum. En M. Shibatani y P. Pardeshi (Eds.), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation (pp. 85-126). John Benjamins.
  49. Siewierska, A. (2013). Passive Constructions. En M. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533
  50. Tsujimura, N. (1996). An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics. Blackwell.
  51. Tsunoda, T. (1985). Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 385-396.
  52. Tubino Blanco, M. (2010). Las causativas léxicas del yaqui. En Z. Estrada y R. Arzápalo (Eds.), Estudios de lenguas amerindias 2: contribuciones al estudio de lenguas originarias de América (pp. 235-252). Universidad de Sonora.
  53. Tubino Blanco, M. (2017). Sufijos de transitividad en lengua yaqui y su impacto en la sintaxis. Cuadernos de Lingüística, 4(2), 1-41.
  54. Zúñiga, F. y Kittilä, S. (2019). Grammatical Voice. Cambridge University Press.